RecomendeMe / Research & Intelligence

Research infrastructure for culture, and an investigative intelligence practice built on it.

RecomendeMe Research supports academic study of human-curated recommendation behavior. RecomendeMe Intelligence, its investigative arm, was presented at the United Nations' ITU AI for Good program.

Cultural research Investigative intelligence ITU AI for Good — UN, 2026
01 — About

RecomendeMe Research

RecomendeMe Research is an observational research environment built on a platform where people share and discover human-curated recommendations. It gives universities, researchers and academic institutions access to real, human-generated data on cultural preferences, recommendation behavior and social patterns.

Unlike synthetic datasets or lab simulations, it enables empirical observation of how people recommend, discover and engage with cultural content in naturalistic settings. The platform is currently used in undergraduate research, capstone studies (TCCs) and interdisciplinary work spanning cultural studies, communication, sociology and digital humanities.

RecomendeMe Research is infrastructure for scholarly inquiry, not a commercial product. Its purpose is to support rigorous, ethical research into culture, identity and social behavior in digital contexts.

02 — Investigative arm

RecomendeMe Intelligence

The investigative intelligence practice of the RecomendeMe ecosystem. It combines knowledge graphs, human curation and AI to convert complex public data into structured maps, timelines and reports — for institutions, journalists, legal offices and governments.

Recognition

The methodology was presented at the ITU AI for Good program of the United Nations, which recognized its potential for integration into global reports and initiatives used by governments, international institutions and justice bodies.

Pipeline

01 Knowledge graphs
02 Human curation
03 AI analysis
Output Maps & reports

Structured public data, investigative human curation and AI-assisted analysis surface connections, timelines and patterns not visible to conventional tools. Output is delivered as structured reports, interactive maps and visual timelines for institutional, journalistic and legal use.

Case log

Finance
Brazil

Banco Master

Documentation and accessible content prepared for authorities and the public, supporting understanding of a complex financial case.

Investigation
MPF

Epstein case

Deep-layer analysis that led to investigation by the MPF (Brazilian Federal Public Ministry) — a direct outcome of the methodology.

Open for partnership

RecomendeMe Intelligence is seeking strategic partners across:

Companies Investigative journalists Law firms Public institutions

RecomendeMe Intelligence operates independently of the RecomendeMe Cultural platform, which remains focused solely on culture, human recommendations and curation.

Request a demo, investigation or partnership

Inquiries: admin@recomendeme.com.br

Contact the team
03 — Open source

Tools & repositories

Code from the RecomendeMe Intelligence practice, released as it stabilizes — investigation tooling, OSINT case management, and the GraphRAG research pipeline behind the papers in the index below.

01

MasterZap

Interactive archive of publicly leaked conversations and connections in the Banco Master case, built entirely from Polícia Federal disclosures and Brazilian press reporting (G1, Folha, Poder360, Metrópoles). Chat-style interface with a connection graph, inspired by the Epstein e-mail archive project.

React · TypeScript · 20 stars · 8 forks · github.com/RecomendeMe-Intel/master-zap
02

RecomendeMe Intelligence — Case OSINT

Local-first investigative case management platform for detectives and intelligence analysts: person profiling, OSINT source tracking, relationship graph, timeline, HEXACO / Dark Triad behavioral scoring, and LGPD-compliant data handling. Runs entirely on the analyst's machine — no cloud, no external server.

03

GraphRAG Serialization Benchmark

Source for Paper 1: benchmarks three subgraph serialization formats (triples, Markdown, JSON) across three open-source models, run on decentralized GPU infrastructure (Nosana / Solana) so investigation data never touches a third-party cloud API.

PyTorch · Transformers · Nosana GPU · github.com/RecomendeMe-Intel/graphrag-serialization-bench
04

GraphRAG — Real-World Investigation Eval

Follow-up to Paper 1: applies the same serialization pipeline and winning model (Qwen2.5-3B) to a real, dense investigation subgraph instead of a synthetic one, adding entity grounding, faithfulness and semantic alignment metrics. Findings and open issues are logged directly in the README.

Python · RAGAS-style metrics · MIT license · github.com/RecomendeMe-Intel/graphrag-realworld-eval

All repositories are public and open source. Issues and pull requests are welcome — see each repo's README for setup and contribution notes.

04 — Scope

Research scope

Cultural and digital identity

Observational data on how people construct and express cultural identity through recommendations — taste formation, identity signaling, and the relationship between personal recommendations and broader cultural narratives.

Human-curated recommendation systems

Insight into recommendation behavior that occurs outside algorithmic mediation: what people choose to recommend, how recommendations function as social acts, and how human curation differs from automated delivery.

Social behavior and collective trends

Aggregated data for studying collective cultural phenomena, emerging trends and shared consumption patterns — including temporal dynamics, geography and demographic variation.

Media, culture and society

Questions of canon formation, cultural gatekeeping, representation and the social functions of recommendation sharing, at the intersection of media studies, cultural analysis and sociology.

RecomendeMe as infrastructure

Not a single research project, but shared infrastructure that multiple researchers and institutions can use for distinct inquiries — a stable, ethically maintained environment for longitudinal and comparative study.

05 — Academic use

How researchers use it

  • Undergraduate research — observational studies, qualitative analysis and empirical projects using platform data.
  • Capstone projects (TCCs) — final-year research drawing on RecomendeMe data.
  • Interdisciplinary studies — communication, sociology, cultural studies, anthropology, digital humanities.
  • Datasets and documentation — anonymized, aggregated data for approved research, with methodological documentation.
  • Qualitative and quantitative analysis — supports interpretive and statistical approaches alike.
For researchers

RecomendeMe Research operates under principles of open science and reproducible research, with clear documentation of collection methods, ethical protocols and data structure.

06 — Publications

Publications and studies

Peer-reviewed articles, technical reports, experimental findings and academic studies developed using RecomendeMe Research data, methodology or infrastructure.

01

Benchmarking Serialization Efficiency and Model Performance in Decentralized GraphRAG Pipelines

Experiment findings · Jun 2026 · ResearchGate
02

From Open Data to Actionable Intelligence: AI & Knowledge Graphs in a Real-World Brazilian Investigation

Presentation · May 2026 · ResearchGate
03

Análise Descritiva do Perfil do Usuário e Padrões de Consumo Cultural na Plataforma RecomendeMe

Experiment findings · Dec 2025 · ResearchGate
04

Algoritmos em Redes Sociais: Evolução, Mecanismos de Engajamento e Impactos nas Plataformas

Article · Dec 2025 · ResearchGate
05

RecomendeMe Feed Algorithm: A Hybrid Human-Centric Ranking Model

Article · Dec 2025 · ResearchGate
06

CULTID: Viabilidade de um Protocolo de Identidade Cultural Universal

Technical report · Jul 2025 · ResearchGate
07

Academic Analysis: Multimedia Recommendations and National Emotional Climate — A Hypothetical Study on the Power and Influence of RecomendeMe

Experiment findings · Jun 2025 · ResearchGate
08

RecomendeMe como Ecossistema Digital de Curadoria Cultural: Inovação Comunitária e Projeção

Working paper · 2025 · ResearchGate

Updated as research projects reach completion and dissemination. Published or presented work using RecomendeMe data can be listed here — contact us.

07 — Ethics

Ethics and data use

Privacy
All research data is anonymized. Personal identifying information is never shared with researchers.
Public data
Only publicly shared recommendations — those users have explicitly chosen to make visible — are included in research datasets.
Informed consent
Users are informed their public data may be used for research and can opt out.
Institutional review
Academic collaborators are expected to obtain ethical approval from their institutions before conducting research.
Transparency
Collection methods, aggregation procedures and limitations are documented for all researchers.
Responsible use
We do not support research that could harm individuals or communities, and reserve the right to decline access requests that raise ethical concerns.

RecomendeMe Research adheres to principles established by professional associations and research ethics boards in the social sciences and humanities.

08 — Partnerships

Partnerships and collaboration

We welcome collaboration with universities, research groups and individual scholars. RecomendeMe Research can support:

  • Institutional partnerships for ongoing research access
  • Collaborative projects with multiple research teams
  • Student research programs and thesis supervision
  • Methodological workshops and training
  • Data sharing agreements with ethical oversight

We are especially interested in partnerships advancing understanding of cultural practices, digital behavior and social patterns through empirical observation.

For investigative intelligence partnerships — companies, journalists, legal offices and public institutions — see RecomendeMe Intelligence above.

09 — Contact

Academic inquiries

For academic inquiries, research proposals and collaboration:

Email: admin@recomendeme.com.br

Please include:

  • Your institutional affiliation
  • A brief description of your research project
  • Specific data or infrastructure needs
  • Relevant ethical approval or review status

We typically respond within one week.